beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis
"The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis . Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Would you like to get a custom case study? It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. The author here is using statistics to present the horrifying picture of the Vietnam War. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. 804-506-0782 He picks from history as well as politics and also supports his choices with philosophical wisdom. He notes, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. So, what America is doing to other nations like Vietnam also matters. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. In "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence," Martin Luther King, a civil rights leader, uses his voice to bring attention to the injustices of race. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. He does this when he writes, "It was a step that rocked the richest, most powerful nation to its foundations" (King 96-97). Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. He says, To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why Im speaking against the war (12). His first reasons are all about practicality. With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". During the final years of . In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" speech was a powerful and eloquent call for peace and justice. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. War is expensive. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam Finally, as the speech comes to a close, King writes, If Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King goes so far as to suggest that the war will bring America to its death if it continues overlooking the problems Americans are facing at home. The paper concludes that Kings dream have not come true, but, Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam. Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. A Time to do What is Right. Kings dialect showed the audience civil right issues, involving many rhetorical strategies using ethos, logos, and pathos, to a racially tempered crowd whom he viewed as different, but not equal. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence SHEC: Resources for Teachers Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. ' (Document, The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. Dont He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. The third section is King's call for change. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). (2016, Nov 14). It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). King Jr knew that war creates confusion and that his audiences mind was boggled with questions. At King demonstates this by saying, In deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Welcome to the world of case studies that can bring you high grades! It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. Through the emotional, destruction of America's effort to support the war, King's powerful use of diction talking the loss of desire and new lives causes the audience to feel sorry for the poor of America. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Thomas 1 Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. They all had the same goal, but took a different approach with their speeches, and how they would rally support to improve racial equality. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. 1. Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam - 648 Words | 123 Help Me His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam | ipl.org The war according to King Jr. is nothing more than a political game played for the sake of fun and ego. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. Many great speeches are increasingly different. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. King wants his audience. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/, StudyCorgi. However, all wanted clarity on the subject. In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. In order to convince his audience that the civil rights movement in the United States should oppose the Vietnam War, the speaker appealed to their ethos, pathos, and logos. Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. He attempts to call upon sympathy within the audience by using highly expressive language. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. PDF Beyond Vietnam, speech by Dr. Martin Luther King, NYC, 4/4/67 King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words 4 May. Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Analysis - 341 Words | Bartleby
No Comments